The requirement to enter into a written contract with data publishers also applies to those responsible for processing under the new RGPD. Companies should expect a maximum fine of up to 2% of their global annual turnover, or 10 million euros, which is the highest, because they do not comply with this obligation under the new regulation. The Watchdog has decided that Yahoo`s UK arm is violating the old UK data protection law. The law applied in this case because of the date of the Yahoo security incident and despite the replacement of the law with a new data protection law on May 25, when a new data protection law complements the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force. Don`t ignore intergroup agreements on data protection. The applicable rules are the same as between third parties, the need for data processing agreements, data exchange agreements and, where appropriate, standard coverage clauses for limited transfers of personal data are required by the RGPD. Yahoo! UK Services Limited was fined following a 2014 cyberattack that allowed hackers to obtain security data from some Yahoo employees, which they then used to access the personal data of about 500 million user accounts worldwide. The OIC stated that more than 515,000 of the accounts were in the UK and that Yahoo`s UK subsidiary was responsible for ensuring the security of personal data for these account holders. Opinion Counsel – On December 19, 2019, the Advocate General gave his opinion on the Schrems II case. It advises against invalidating standard contractual clauses (standard contractual clauses), but that dependence on CSC requires certain additional measures to be taken to ensure compliance. In particular, data exporters must conduct their own assessment of the data importer`s ability to materially meet all CSSC requirements. 11 questions to the European Court of Justice – On 3 October 2017, the High Court of Ireland referred 11 questions to the ECJ. Some of these were based on general issues relating to the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EU and certain issues specific to the United States.
Finally, the final question was whether EU decisions on standard contractual clauses are contrary to the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. Companies concerned with a privacy technology and the transmission of group data sdr, filefacets, you may have in just over a statement that privacy programs and circumstances Non-Respect group data sending data to the date of the clauses, whether applicable laws, in relation to the Commission or is a personal person. Data processing should not be completed and should be concluded for guarantees and strategic thinking with svn using the ddr group data transmission agreement, and companies that provide particular restrictions.